Unfortunately it’s normal practice in newborn photography. Shoot then charge a ton per printed product. By the time client realises, kid’s too big to reshoot

yeah most likely.
If not exactly those moments, it will still be done like that.

Cheap prints. :)

Personally. As long as I dont get tagged after my clients butcher my photos. I don’t give a crap.

the square on the camera (sensor) is sensitive . dont touch it. the mount is tough

youre more likely to be successful to ask for a reedit in more neutral tone (and pay for it) than getting raws.

can sharpen and what not. but you wotn get detail that isnt there. it tools available will be either sharpened or AI filled with potential for artifacts/mistakes

Not a professional… You hired a stay at home mum that does the odd photography jobs for a bit of cash on hand

Bet it’s not a registered business

Cheapway Use a scanner. Scan them at highest resolution. Import on any editing program and “invert/negative”. And there you go.

I’m in Essex Suffolk border so can potentially help if close

unfortenately u can get picked on with anything.
I got asked straight up if I was a pedo by a dog walker at a public park, while sitting on a bench, cameras on the bench next to me turned off with lens caps on while waiting for a couple for their pre-wedding shoot once. Worth noting there was not a single human being other than the dog walker and myself in a 250+meter radius

Also on how protective parents are of their kids potentially be in a photos background cuz “pedos” but then happily pose with their kids for 1st page on local newspaper giving away loo rolls during covid

Last time I checked pedos can buy newspapers

a lot of people still think they have the right to privacy in public (they dont) and can tell you to delete any photos of them (they dont).
Also a lot of people think kids are more protected from being photographed in public (they arent)
There is the moral side of it though, culturewise, the UK people like their privacy, but at the same time, they dont realise that in a town center they’re being filmed by 3-5 cameras at all times.

The tamron 35-105 f2-2.8 is excellent but really heavy.

I deliver 3:2 ratio. Same as every cameras shoot at.

I have all from start. It costs about 2-3 bucks per wedding to backup.

Personally. Find the whole “first name last name photography” cliche as f***. Plus will make it harder for you to do 2 events at same time and outsource an associate shooter, as people be like “I hired Harry Smith photography and I got a josh shooting my wedding”.

Sensor wise. There has been little to no improvements on cameras for photography in the last 20 years.

Most improvements have been fps speed, display resolutions and in-sensor auto focusing and tracking (mirrorless)

If you test in a control environment a shot taken with a newish a7iii or an oldie 20 year old Nikon d800 o the same lens /same iso, you won’t see any difference

Moire

you are cropping an image into 800%, what do you expect? to see individual hairs?

depends on what failed.

The card

Or its just a bad file that wasnt written on it properly ( like pulling a battery off a camera while its writting)