Like a lens that I own? Or would have to buy? Or like I can just pick any lens to use for the rest of time at no cost to me?
This is tough… im gonna have to give multiple answers lol.
For a DSLR and currently I own it - Nikkor 85mm f/1.8G
For a mirrorless and currently I own it - Zeiss Planar 50mm f/2
Any lense at no cost to me - Leica Noctilux 50mm f/0.95
This has been kind of an interesting thought experiment for me honestly. I primarily enjoy shooting wildlife photography… so its interesting to see that it this scenario id effectively give it up all together for the sake of having a more all around lens. Yea… I could keep a 70-200mm f/2.8… but thats just kinda not long enough for wildlife photography and not a low enough f-stop for portraits for my taste.
I cannot focus at .95. I have a Voigtlander at f/1 and I get it right like literally 5 percent of the time. That noctilux is a killer on a rangefinder, man.
Like a lens that I own? Or would have to buy? Or like I can just pick any lens to use for the rest of time at no cost to me?
This is tough… im gonna have to give multiple answers lol.
This has been kind of an interesting thought experiment for me honestly. I primarily enjoy shooting wildlife photography… so its interesting to see that it this scenario id effectively give it up all together for the sake of having a more all around lens. Yea… I could keep a 70-200mm f/2.8… but thats just kinda not long enough for wildlife photography and not a low enough f-stop for portraits for my taste.
I cannot focus at .95. I have a Voigtlander at f/1 and I get it right like literally 5 percent of the time. That noctilux is a killer on a rangefinder, man.
I stick mostly to 1.5 now. Haha