That is not true. By calibrating your screen you are setting a standard benchmark on what colors your images are “supposed” to look like across all displays. In OP’s case, his $300 monitor is physically unable to display true accurate colors no matter how many times he calibrate his monitor. But to say calibrating your monitor only matter if you print is just ignorant. Plus you would have to calibrate the printer to get truly accurate colors and prints. Printer and monitors use different color profiles and different ways of displaying the color, it takes time, effort and machinery to match print to screen 1:1. None of it is one and done process.
That is not true. By calibrating your screen you are setting a standard benchmark on what colors your images are “supposed” to look like across all displays. In OP’s case, his $300 monitor is physically unable to display true accurate colors no matter how many times he calibrate his monitor. But to say calibrating your monitor only matter if you print is just ignorant. Plus you would have to calibrate the printer to get truly accurate colors and prints. Printer and monitors use different color profiles and different ways of displaying the color, it takes time, effort and machinery to match print to screen 1:1. None of it is one and done process.