I recently was hired to shoot for a client who will be participating in a sporting event. Said sporting event also has official photographers by the event organizers, but they are only paid via direct sales to participants, no upfront payment. Taking this job means ill be cutting in potential sales for the official photographers, whom I am also friends and shoot with from time to time.
My question is, is it morally ok for me to take the job in these situations? My client came directly to me even when they could’ve chosen the official photographers themselves. Should I just honor my clients wishes and go ahead? Looking at the big picture I realize the bigger assholes are the organizers who don’t pay their official photographers upfront.
Has anyone been put in similar situations? I’d really appreciate some second thoughts and discussions. Thanks.
Absolutely 100% agreed. I wouldn’t agree to those terms now as well and had to negotiate a fixed price upfront with these organizers while previously working with them. The only thing I can say that sort of fights back against cheap work is improving the quality of your own work.
Absolutely but also be ready to decline and just say no to lowball offers. Some ppl are not willing to pay for quality,.also those clients are tend to be annoying and start nitpicking afterwards,.wanting extra edits and so on.
You get booked bc you can do something they cant and everybody who is not willing to make a fair offer should be aware of that.