I recently was hired to shoot for a client who will be participating in a sporting event. Said sporting event also has official photographers by the event organizers, but they are only paid via direct sales to participants, no upfront payment. Taking this job means ill be cutting in potential sales for the official photographers, whom I am also friends and shoot with from time to time.
My question is, is it morally ok for me to take the job in these situations? My client came directly to me even when they could’ve chosen the official photographers themselves. Should I just honor my clients wishes and go ahead? Looking at the big picture I realize the bigger assholes are the organizers who don’t pay their official photographers upfront.
Has anyone been put in similar situations? I’d really appreciate some second thoughts and discussions. Thanks.
There is no conflict here. You are being hired to do a job. The fact someone else is also being hired to shoot the same event (and maybe didn’t negotiate a very good deal) is nothing to do with you.
This is no different than a sporting event hiring a photographer and local newspapers sending their own along too.