it is said that full frame aperture equivalent of 2.8 to aps-c is 4.2. does it mean that shutter speed of aps-c is one stop slower that full frame on the same aperture? given the same focal length equivalent e.g. aps-c 23mm and ff 35mm.

  • av4rice@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes, a larger entrance pupil diameter lets through more light than a smaller entrance pupil diameter.

    But don’t forget that focal length also affects light transmission. A longer focal length gathers light from a smaller area of the scene and therefore less light than a shorter focal length.

    That’s the whole reason the f-number is set up as a ratio between focal length and entrance pupil diameter, to normalize the effect of focal length so you don’t have to account for it separately when figuring exposure. So an f/1.4 aperture should be the same contribution to exposure no matter what the focal length. That’s why nobody needs to specify the focal length when communicating exposure settings. A 16mm entrance pupil diameter lets in less light while a 23mm focal length lets in more light, and that equals out to the same as a 25mm entrance pupil diameter letting in more light and paired with a 35mm focal length letting in less light.

    And none of the above has anything to do with different format sizes. At 23mm and f/1.4 on full frame format you have the same brightness at 35mm and 1/1.4 on the same full frame format.

    • oldlurker114@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      But don’t forget that focal length also affects light transmission. A longer focal length gathers light from a smaller area of the scene and therefore less light than a shorter focal length.

      This is not the case in this context as it was specifically about APS-C vs FF. 23mm APS-C lens and 35mm FF lens have the same field of view, thus the same light reflects from the scene to the lens.

      A 16mm entrance pupil diameter lets in less light while a 23mm focal length lets in more light, and that equals out to the same as a 25mm entrance pupil diameter letting in more light and paired with a 35mm focal length letting in less light.

      A 16mm entrance pupil of 23mm f/1.4 on APS-C collects about 2.3 times less light than 35mm f/1.4 on FF with it’s 25mm entrance pupil - the same amount of light reflects from the scene to the lens, but the system with the larger entrance pupil collects more light.

      For exposure purposes this is of course not relevant, but for image quality and DOF it is.

      • av4rice@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is not the case in this context as it was specifically about APS-C vs FF.

        Focal length affects transmission in any context. The f-number is calculated the same regardless of format size, incorporating the focal length. Exposure settings values, including the aperture as expressed as an f-number, work the same for every format size.

        For exposure purposes this is of course not relevant

        This discussion is about exposure purposes.

        • oldlurker114@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Focal length affects transmission in any context

          It doesn’t, at least in principle.

          The f-number is calculated the same regardless of format size, incorporating the focal length. Exposure settings values, including the aperture as expressed as an f-number, work the same for every format size.

          Of course. Have I said anything else?

          This discussion is about exposure purposes

          Really? You went way beyond that for example when you wrote:

          But don’t forget that focal length also affects light transmission. A longer focal length gathers light from a smaller area of the scene and therefore less light than a shorter focal length.

          This has nothing to do with exposure purposes at all, but about how much light is collected. And as the context was FF vs APS-C and the size of aperture, what you wrote was hardly helpful.

          • av4rice@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It doesn’t, at least in principle.

            It’s built into the aperture f-number because it does, just like entrance pupil diameter does. Thus, it answers OP’s real question about why exposure isn’t changing even when the entrance pupil diameter changes: because focal length is also changing and ultimately you’re arriving at the same f/1.4 f-number.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-number

            Have I said anything else?

            Yes, you said: “This is not the case in this context”

            You went way beyond that

            I’m just talking about how focal length and entrance pupil diameter both go into the aperture f-number for the purposes of exposure. That’s literally how the f-number is mathematically defined.

            This has nothing to do with exposure purposes at all, but about how much light is collected.

            How much light is collected is not the same as exposure, indeed. But it’s a component of exposure that affects the exposure.

            And as the context was FF vs APS-C and the size of aperture, what you wrote was hardly helpful.

            What I wrote applies in the context of different format sizes. It also applies in the context of the same format size.

            • oldlurker114@alien.topB
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Well, I simply wanted to clarify what you presented in a way which seemed to me to be causing more confustion to OP in this context than necessary.

              Basically this was the problem for me:

              don’t forget that focal length also affects light transmission. A longer focal length gathers light from a smaller area of the scene and therefore less light than a shorter focal length.

              In the context of format comparison, it can get confusing to the OP as in this context the focal lengths collect light from the same area of the scene, not different.

              Thus, it answers OP’s real question about why exposure isn’t changing even when the entrance pupil diameter changes

              We interpreted OP’s question differently. Not saying either interpretion is better or worse.