Context: I recently posted a landscape shot with ant sized people on the distant cliffside (not the subject matter, purely coincidental). They were nude, but no body parts, face, belongings were identifiable, even when zoomed in.
I received a ban.
Do you think this was justified?
O. G photo for reference
https://preview.redd.it/ibzle1gtxiwb1.jpeg?width=2160&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=82edf35fdba60d1dbaa6921d878f7d9010ee53d6
Go Photoshop. Paint some clothes on the nude people.
I really can’t tell if they are nude or not. If you say they are I believe you, but they could just be wearing skimpy outfits.
My point exactly. It’s not offensive and not even easily determined.
Seriously? I really had to search to find the person! That’s ludicrous.
It makes me think of this clip from Brass Eye about a photo of a normal-looking hillside that would send a paedophile into a frenzy because there was a child in it somewhere…
https://twitter.com/shornKOOMINS/status/913426755976876038
It just makes me sad the amount of censorship out there.