That’s actually the answer I was looking for lol. I don’t need the exact image quality that I get from APS-C cameras, but at the same time I don’t want a compact that takes same kind of photos that I could take with my phone. I don’t know if Canon G7X Mark ii is up to the task, but I have seen good pics taken with it.
I’ve only used 1”, an FZ1000. I wanted a pocket camera, so I got the G9X, then a ZS100 came my way. Thats like my mini FZ.
Anyways, I’ve pulled great snaps from all of these, and have even printed some 20x16 canvases.
No, you’re not going to get full frame performance, but with care, some lovely photos.
If you don’t need the aperture, check out the ZS200. Similar to my 100, but more zoom & killer viewfinder. I appreciate the features, and def prefer viewfinder over tilt screen. Plus 25-250mm. Also, if I’m taking pocket camera candid shots at night, I’m using the phone, anyways.
That’s actually the answer I was looking for lol. I don’t need the exact image quality that I get from APS-C cameras, but at the same time I don’t want a compact that takes same kind of photos that I could take with my phone. I don’t know if Canon G7X Mark ii is up to the task, but I have seen good pics taken with it.
I’ve only used 1”, an FZ1000. I wanted a pocket camera, so I got the G9X, then a ZS100 came my way. Thats like my mini FZ.
Anyways, I’ve pulled great snaps from all of these, and have even printed some 20x16 canvases.
No, you’re not going to get full frame performance, but with care, some lovely photos.
If you don’t need the aperture, check out the ZS200. Similar to my 100, but more zoom & killer viewfinder. I appreciate the features, and def prefer viewfinder over tilt screen. Plus 25-250mm. Also, if I’m taking pocket camera candid shots at night, I’m using the phone, anyways.